Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Coury  Koutz's avatar

“ Without kidnapping, selling, and possessing people, slavery cannot exist.” This, along with your reply to an earlier comment of mine, is indicative of a definition of slavery not in line with common or even biblical use. For example, when Egypt enslaved the Israelites, did it kidnap them? No. They initially came and settled in Goshen. When they left, they left from Goshen. They were enslaved and stayed in the place where they were already living.

Likewise, one could say that the Nazis enslaved prisoners that they took and kept in concentration camps. But nobody was selling these people to the Nazis. Similarly, the Egyptian authority imposed slavery on the Israelites, but did not buy them from anyone. The absence of kidnapping and commercialization does not slavery unmake.

“ Under God’s law, anyone who sells people for money is put to death.

Under God’s law, anyone who possesses people as property is put to death.” The referenced verse refers only to the selling and possession of the aforementioned kidnapping victim, not about someone who wasn’t abducted. There’s also some disagreement on how to translate it, with the ESV, Brenton, and one translation from Syriac Aramaic seemingly suggesting that the penalty also applies to any new person who comes into possession of the kidnapping victim (and are the only English translations on BibleHub with such an implication), while most others say it is just about the original kidnapper and whether they sold off or still have their victim.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts